ABSTRACT:

This research was planned in order to determine the eating and food buying behaviors of generations Y and Z. The research was carried out using descriptive/cross-sectional research model. The population of the study consists of individuals born between 1980 and 1999 living in a province of Turkey (generation Y) and individuals born in the year 2000 and later (generation Z). A total of 382 individuals were determined as a sample from among the individuals in the population by stratified sampling method. The study was completed with a total of 569 participants, including 241 from generation Y and 328 from generation Z. The data were collected with the “Information Form” and the “Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire”. Data analysis SPSS v26 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were made with the statistical package program. In the analysis of the data, descriptive statistics, independent t-test was used for binary group comparisons and One-Way ANOVA was used for multi-group comparisons. In the study a statistically significant difference was found between the scale scores of Y and Z generation participants and the gender variable (p=0.005, p=0.001, respectively). In the study, a statistically significant difference was found between the scale scores of generation Z participants and the “State of paying attention to whether the food is organic when buying”, “State of paying attention to the content of the food to be bought” and “State of social media influencing food purchasing decisions” (p<0.05). A significant difference was found between the scale scores of the Y generation participants and the “Paying attention to the TSE stamp when buying food” (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the total scale scores of generation Y and generation Z in the study (p>0.05). As a result, it was found that the eating behaviors of generation Y and Z were similar. However, it has been determined that food buying behaviors can show differences.

KEYWORDS:

Generation Y, generation Z, eating behavior, food buying

REFERENCES :

1) Townsend JR, Kirby TO, Marshall TM, Church DD, Jajtner AR, Esposito R. Foundational nutrition: ımplications for human health. Nutrients. 2023; 22;15(13):2837.
2) Orkun Erkılıç T, Bayraktar B, Çelikel Taşci S, & Çakır Y. Examining the relationship between hedonic hunger states and some physiological parameters in university students. Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of The Institute of Science and Technology. 2024; 7(3), 1153-1161.
3) Kılıç EB, Altıner DD. Attitudes and purchasing behaviors of consumers towards functional foods. In International Marmara Social Sciences Congress. 2021; 324.
4) Bayraktar B. Endocrine system. Physiology for health sciences. Akademisyen Kitabevi. 2020.
5) An R. Effectiveness of subsidies in promoting healthy food purchases and consumption: a review of field experiments. Public Health Nutr. 2013; 16(7), 1215-1228.
6) Karakuş S, Yıldırım H, Büyüköztürk Ş. Adaptation of three factor eating questionnaire (TFEQ-R21) into Turkish culture: A validity and reliability study. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2016; 15(3), 229-237.
7) Macht M. How emotions affect eating: a five-way model. Appetite. 2008; 50(1), 1-11.
8) Forouhi NG. Embracing complexity: making sense of diet, nutrition, obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2023; 66(5), 786-799.
9) Sevinçer G, Konuk N. Emosyonel yeme. Journal of Mood Disorders. 2013; 3(4), 171-178.
10) Koçer S, Aysel A. A study on the differences of generations’ consumption behaviors. Kocaeli University Faculty of Communication Research Journal. 2019; (14), 77-105.
11) TDK. Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. (2022). https://sozluk.gov.tr/ Erişim tarihi: 05.01.2024
12) Akşit Aşık N. Factors Affecting Food Preferences of X and Z Generation Consumers. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies. 2019; 7(4), 2599- 2611.
13) Dölekoğlu CÖ, Çelik O. Food purchasing behavior of Y generation consumers. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature. 2018; 21, 55-66.
14) İçme T, Yıldırım T, Büyük U. Perceptions of distance education of generation Z students. Erciyes Academi. 2022; 36(1), 82-102.
15) Ceylan E, Alagöz SB. A study for determining the effect of consumer’s decision-making manners on organic food buying behaviour. KMU Journal of Social and Economic Research. 2020; 22(38), 148-163.
16) İnan R, Bekar A, Urlu H. An assessment of consumers of organic food purchase behavior and attitudes. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies. 2021; 9(1), 220-235.
17) Kılıç O, Eryılmaz GA. Agricultural and food product preferences of consumers during the Covid-19 period: The case of Samsun province, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2022; 9(1), 72-78.
18) Öncül M, Sekman Y, Kınıklı F, Artukoğlu M. An investgaton of the consumers purchasing choices for food products: The case of Izmir province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2019; 25(2), 207-217.
19) Yüzbaşıoğlu R, Ataoğlu SN. Effect of ındividuals’ green purchasing behavior, consumption and environmental awareness (The case of Manisa province of Salihli district). Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University. 2021; 58(1), 63-74.
20) TUİK. (2021). İl, yaş grubu ve cinsiyete göre nüfus. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=nufus-ve-demografi-109&dil=1 Erişim tarihi: 20.01.2024
21) Yamane T. Temel Örnekleme Yöntemleri. Çevirenler: Esin A, Aydın C, Bakır MA, Gürbüzsel E. İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık, 2001.
22) Yücel M, Karaibrahimoğlu A, Orhan H. Adult Eating Behavior Scale: Adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability study. Eurasıan Journal of Health Sciences. 2022; 5(2), 59-67.
23) Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited. 2013.
24) Magkos F, Arvaniti F, Zampelas A. Organic food: buying more safety or just peace of mind? A critical review of the literature. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2006; 46(1), 23-56.
25) Lo M, Matthews D. Results of routine testing of organic food for agro-chemical residues. In Proceedings of the UK organic research, Conference 2002; 61-64. Organic Centre Wales, Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth.
26) McGowan R. (2003). Victorian produce monitoring 2002–results of victorian government chemical residue testing of fresh produce. Victoria: State Government of Victoria, Department of Primary Industries. Available online: http: www. dpi. vic. gov. au/dpi/nrenfa. nsf/646e9b4bba1afb2bca256c420053b5ce/a1ffbfa0c2dbe3f5ca256e61000bafe4/$ FILE/VPM, 202002.
27) Newman DM. Sociology: Exploring the architecture of everyday life. Sage Publications, 2020.
28) Fernando J. (2016). General Differences and Demand for Food. Consumer Cornerupdates from the Competitiveness and Market Analysis Section 37. https:// www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/sis16056/$file/37_ jeewani_generations_july_2016.pdf?OpenElement. asp (10.12.2020).
29) Bayraktar B, Tekce E, Aksakal V, Gül M, Takma Ç, Bayraktar S, et al. Effect of the addition of essential fatty acid mixture to the drinking water of the heat stress broilers on adipokine (Apelin, BDNF) response, histopathologic findings in liver and intestines, and some blood parameters. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2020; 19(1), 656-666.
30) Shipman ZD. Factors affecting food choices of millennials: how they decide what to eat? Journal of Tourismology. 2020; 6(1), 1-13.