Harmful Traditional Practices and their Perceived Health Effects among Residents of a Semi-Urban Community in South-South Nigeria

  • Home
  • Harmful Traditional Practices and their Perceived Health Effects among Residents of a Semi-Urban Community in South-South Nigeria

Harmful Traditional Practices and their Perceived Health Effects among Residents of a Semi-Urban Community in South-South Nigeria

1*Dr. Bodeno Ehis,2Dr. Hendrith Esene
1,2Department of Community Medicine, Igbinedion University, Edo State, Nigeria

ABSTRACT 

Background: Harmful traditional practices remain a public health concern because of their potential physical, psychological, and social consequences. Their persistence is influenced by cultural beliefs, family expectations, social norms, and perceptions of their health effects. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess knowledge of harmful traditional practices and their perceived health effects among residents of Okada, Edo State, Nigeria.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among adult residents of Okada. A multistage sampling technique was used to recruit respondents from selected residential clusters. Data were collected using a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of harmful traditional practices, and perceived health effects. Knowledge was assessed using a 9-point composite score and categorized as poor, fair, or good. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27. Descriptive statistics, chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests, and binary logistic regression were used, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: A total of 294 respondents participated, giving a 99.3% response rate. The mean age was 39.34 ± 11.96 years, and 181 (61.6%) were female. Most respondents, 260 (88.4%), had heard of harmful traditional practices. Early/child marriage (77.2%) and female genital mutilation (75.5%) were the most commonly recognized practices. Infection (72.8%), and psychological trauma (71.1%) were the most frequently recognized health risks. The mean knowledge score was 6.28 ± 1.37 (69.8%), with 138 (46.9%) demonstrating good knowledge, 130 (44.2%) fair knowledge, and 26 (8.8%) poor knowledge.
Conclusion: Residents of Okada demonstrated generally good awareness and moderate-to-good knowledge of harmful traditional practices. However, important gaps existed in knowledge of relevant laws and policies, while perceptions of traditional practices remained inconsistent. Community-based health education involving healthcare workers, schools, families, community leaders, and the media should emphasize practice-specific health risks, correct misconceptions, and improve awareness of legal protections against harmful traditional practices.

 

KEYWORDS

harmful traditional practices, health effects, female genital mutilation, child marriage; scarification, Nigeria.
 

REFERENCES

1) Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Fact sheet no. 23: harmful traditional practices affecting the health of women and children. Geneva: OHCHR; 1995.
2) Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Committee on the Rights of the Child. Joint general recommendation no. 31 of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women / general comment no. 18 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child on harmful practices. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/31/Rev.1–CRC/C/GC/18/Rev.1. Geneva: United Nations; 2019.
3) World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation. Fact sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025.
4) Nnanatu CC, Atilola G, Komba P, Mavatikua L, Moore Z, Matanda D, et al. Evaluating changes in the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among 0–14 years old girls in Nigeria using data from multiple surveys: a novel Bayesian hierarchical spatio-temporal model. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246661. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246661.
5) Gbadebo BM, Salawu AT, Afolabi RF, Salawu MM, Fagbamigbe AF, Adebowale AS. Cohort analysis of the state of female genital cutting in Nigeria: prevalence, daughter circumcision and attitude towards its discontinuation. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):182. doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01324-2.
6) Pallitto C, Ruiz-Vallejo F, Mochache V, Stein K, Vogel JP, Petzold M. Exploring the health complications of female genital mutilation through a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1387. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-21584-z.
7) Berg RC, Underland V, Odgaard-Jensen J, Fretheim A, Vist GE. Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(11):e006316. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006316.
8) Abdalla SM, Galea S. Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(4):e001553. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001553.
9) Garve R, Garve M, Türp JC, Fobil JN, Meyer CG. Scarification in sub-Saharan Africa: social skin, remedy and medical import. Trop Med Int Health. 2017;22(6):708–15. doi:10.1111/tmi.12878.
10) Ayeni OA, Ayeni OO, Jackson R. Observations on the procedural aspects and health effects of scarification in sub-Saharan Africa. J Cutan Med Surg. 2007;11(6):217–21. doi:10.2310/7750.2007.00026.
11) Adoga AA, Nimkur TL. The traditionally amputated uvula amongst Nigerians: still an ongoing practice. ISRN Otolaryngol. 2011;2011:704924. doi:10.5402/2011/704924.
12) Getachew T, Negash A, Kebede SM, Cheru A, Eyeberu A, Tura AK. The complications of traditional uvulectomy and concurrent occurrences of cultural malpractices in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2024;10(19):e38978. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38978.
13) Shell-Duncan B, Wander K, Hernlund Y, Moreau A. Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia: testing predictions of social convention theory. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(8):1275–83. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.022.
14) Efferson C, Vogt S, Elhadi A, Ahmed HEF, Fehr E. Female genital cutting is not a social coordination norm. Science. 2015;349(6255):1446–7. doi:10.1126/science.aaa7978.
15) Oni TO, Okunlola DA. Contextual determinants of generational continuation of female genital mutilation among women of reproductive age in Nigeria: analysis of the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey. Reprod Health. 2024;21(1):39. doi:10.1186/s12978-024-01778-1.
16) Ikeaba NC, Balogun MR, Olubodun T, Okafor I. Harmful traditional practices among market women in Ojuwoye Market Mushin, South West, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2022;21(3):208–16. doi:10.4103/aam.aam_112_20.
17) Gabriel-Job N, Udofia EA, Akani NA. Harmful traditional practices among adolescents: knowledge, perception and complications. Niger Health J. 2023;22(4):433–9.
18) Anyanwu CE, Torpey K, Sanni OF, Abiodun OP, Anyanwu ID. Knowledge and attitude of Nigerian women aged 15–49 years on the practice of female genital mutilation. J Epidemiol Public Health. 2025;10(2):171–82. doi:10.26911/jepublichealth.2025.10.02.04.
19) Mobolaji JW, Fatusi AO, Adedini SA. Ethnicity, religious affiliation and girl-child marriage: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative sample of female adolescents in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):583. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08714-5.
20) Bolarinwa OA, Ahinkorah BO, Okyere J, Seidu AA, Olagunju OS. A multilevel analysis of prevalence and factors associated with female child marriage in Nigeria using the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey data. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):158. doi:10.1186/s12905-022-01733-x.
21) Wogu JO, Amonyeze C, Babatola Folorunsho RO, Aloh HE. An evaluation of the impact of media campaign against female genital mutilation (FGM) in the rural communities of Enugu State, Nigeria. Glob J Health Sci. 2019;11(14):37. doi:10.5539/gjhs.v11n14p37.
22) Agboeze J, Nwali MI, Orji ML, Nwobodo MI, Ugwoke SI, Nnaji TN. Exploring the persistence of female genital mutilation: primary healthcare providers’ experience and their perspective on elimination. Niger Med J. 2026;67(1):84–92. doi:10.71480/nmj.v67i1.990.
23) Olunuga O, Robinson R, Ojajuni P, Opondo W, Gitari W, Owolabi I, et al. Impact of the StopCut project on the practice of female genital mutilation/cutting in Southwest Nigeria: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):768. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-21976-1.
24) Mahgoub E, Nimir M, Abdalla S, Elhuda DA. Effects of school-based health education on attitudes of female students towards female genital mutilation in Sudan. East Mediterr Health J. 2019;25(6):406–12. doi:10.26719/emhj.18.053.
25) Ashimi A, Aliyu L, Shittu M, Amole T. A multicentre study on knowledge and attitude of nurses in northern Nigeria concerning female genital mutilation. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014;19(2):134–40. doi:10.3109/13625187.2014.885940.
26) Odo AN, Dibia SIC, Nwagu EN, Umoke M, Umoke PCI. Towards characterization of female genital mutilation (FGM) in rural Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2020;20(4):1968–78. doi:10.4314/ahs.v20i4.55.
27) Onuh SO, Igberase GO, Umeora JO, Okogbenin SA, Otoide VO, Gharoro EP. Female genital mutilation: knowledge, attitude and practice among nurses. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98(3):409–14.
28) Uche AO, Obiora AV. Assessing social media influence on Nigerian youths’ knowledge, awareness and attitude towards anti-female genital mutilation (FGM) legislative provisions. Asian J Educ Soc Stud. 2025;51(2):305–20. doi:10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i21787.
29) Nwali MI, Agboeze J. Culture, beliefs, attitude and peer group influence on female genital mutilation in Southeast Nigeria. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;13(8):1350–62. doi:10.4236/ojog.2023.138113.
30) 28 Too Many, Orchid Project, TrustLaw. Nigeria: the law and FGM. Version 3. London: 28 Too Many; 2022.
31) Agbaje OS, Agu BN, Osakwe KC. Perception of harmful traditional practices among women of childbearing age in Oru West Local Government Area, Imo State. Sci J Public Health. 2015;3(2):150–60. doi:10.11648/j.sjph.20150302.11.
32) Kaplan Marcusán A, Riba Singla L, Laye M, Secka DM, Utzet M, Le Charles M. Female genital mutilation/cutting: changes and trends in knowledge, attitudes, and practices among health care professionals in The Gambia. Int J Womens Health. 2016;8:103–17. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S102201.
33) Adisa TA, Mordi C, Timming AR. Employment discrimination against indigenous people with tribal marks in Nigeria: the painful face of stigma. Work Employ Soc. 2023;38(3):787–808. doi:10.1177/09500170231173591.
34) Matanda DJ, Van Eekert N, Croce-Galis M, Gay J, Middelburg MJ, Hardee K. What interventions are effective to prevent or respond to female genital mutilation? A review of existing evidence from 2008–2020. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(5):e0001855. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001855.

 

Cite this article

Ehis, B., & Esene, H. (2026). Harmful Traditional Practices and their Perceived Health Effects among Residents of a Semi-Urban Community in South-South Nigeria. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH, 5(11), 1157-1167. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijhmr.2026.v5i11n05

  • Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *