1Omar Qahtan Yaseen , 2Hayder Abd Ulrhman Majeed
1 Department of Heet Education, General Directorate of Education in Anbar, Ministry of Education, Hit, Anbar 31007, Iraq.
2 The University of Meshreq,College of Medical Sciences Technology.
ABSTRACT:
Background: Mutations in the copper transport gene KCNJ11 cause Diabetes Mellitus, a rare inherited autosomal recessive condition of copper metabolism with hepatic and mental symptoms. The Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT) method was used in a study to examine the possible effects of protein coding variants on function. SIFT is a computational technique that is frequently used to forecast the outcomes of missense variants, which are single nucleotide changes in the DNA sequence that lead to the replacement of one amino acid with another in the protein.
Objective: This study’s objectives include determining the degree to which gene KCNJ11 mutations contribute to the development of Diabetes Mellitus assess whether the observed variations in the KCNJ11 gene would potentially affect protein function and thus contribute to the development of genetic disease. Understanding the impact of protein structure on the SIFT results is emphasized in the paragraph.
Methods: We used the SIFT tool to analyze mutations occurring in the KCNJ11 gene because this gene is of particular interest due to its association with certain genetic diseases.
Results: According to the study’s findings, the SIFT tool identified the majority of the changes detected in the samples examined (particularly a (G>C) variance) as tolerant, this implies that these specific variants are unlikely to have a major influence on protein function and, as a result, are less likely to contribute to the development of the examined genetic disorder. The results, however, showed two variants (G>T and C>T) that SIFT categorized as intolerant in some of the sample instances. These particular alterations are likely to impact protein function and may be of relevance for future research into their relationship with the investigated hereditary disorder.
Conclusions: Overall, the work emphasizes the utility of employing the SIFT method to predict illness outcomes based on coding variants and protein function. Researcher was able to get insight into the possible influence of polymorphisms in the KCNJ11 gene on protein function and their relevance to genetic disease detection by using this computational technique.
KEYWORDS :
KCNJ11; Diabetes Mellitus; prediction; SIFT; Algorithm
REFERENCES :
1) T. J. Wilkin, “The accelerator hypothesis: a review of theevidence for insulin resistance as the basis for type I as well astype II diabetes,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 33, no. 7,pp. 716–726, 2009.
2) D. G. Gardner and D. M. Shoback, Eds., Greenspan’s Basic & Clinical Endocrinology, McGraw-Hill Medical, New York, NY,USA, 2007.
3) P. Z. Zimmet, D. J. Magliano, W. H. Herman, and J. E. Shaw,“Diabetes: a 21st century challenge,” The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2014.
4) V. Kumar, A. K. Abbas, N. Fausto, and J. C. Aster, Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, Professional Edition: Expert Consult-Online, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2009.
5) D. W. Cooke and L. Plotnick, “Type 1 diabetes mellitus in pediatrics,” Pediatrics in Review, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 374–385, 2008.
6) E. A. Ryan and L. Enns, “Role of gestational hormones in the induction of insulin resistance,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 341–347, 1988.
7) S. Prudente, B. Dallapiccola, F. Pellegrini, A. Doria, and V. Trischitta, “Genetic prediction of common diseases: still no help for the clinical diabetologist!,” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 929–936, 2012.
8) D. Sluik, H. Boeing, K. Li et al., “Lifestyle factors and mortality risk in individuals with diabetes mellitus: are the associations different from those in individuals without diabetes?” Diabetologia,vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2014.
9) Zhang, S., Xiao, Y., Wang, Y., Qian, C., Zhang, R., Liu, J., … & Zhang, H. (2023). Role of kisspeptin in decidualization and unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion via the ERK1/2 signalling pathway. Placenta.
10) Fang, L., Yan, Y., Gao, Y., Wu, Z., Wang, Z., Yang, S., … & Sun, Y. P. (2022). TGF-β1 inhibits human trophoblast cell invasion by upregulating kisspeptin expression through ERK1/2 but not SMAD signaling pathway. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 20(1), 22.
11) Grassi, D., Marraudino, M., García-Segura, L. M., & Panzica, G. C. (2022). The hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus as a central hub for the estrogenic modulation of neuroendocrine function and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 65, 100974.
12) Cheng, J. C., Gao, Y., Chen, J., Meng, Q., & Fang, L. (2023). EGF promotes human trophoblast cell invasion by downregulating CTGF expression via PI3K/AKT signaling. Reproduction, 165(1), 113-122.
13) Gomes, V. C., & Sones, J. L. (2021). From inhibition of trophoblast cell invasion to proapoptosis: what are the potential roles of kisspeptins in preeclampsia?. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 321(1), R41-R48.
14) Calthorpe, R. J., Poulter, C., Smyth, A. R., Sharkey, D., Bhatt, J., Jenkins, G., & Tatler, A. L. (2023). Complex roles of TGF-beta signaling pathways in lung development and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology.
15) Mirzaei, S., Paskeh, M. D. A., Saghari, Y., Zarrabi, A., Hamblin, M. R., Entezari, M., … & Samarghandian, S. (2022). Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) in prostate cancer: A dual function mediator?. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.
16) Liu, S., Baeg, G. H., Yang, Y., Goh, F. G., Bao, H., Wagner, E. J., … & Cai, Y. (2023). The Integrator complex desensitizes cellular response to TGF-β/BMP signaling. Cell Reports, 42(1), 112007.
17) Dewidar, B., Meyer, C., Dooley, S., & Meindl-Beinker, N. (2019). TGF-β in hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrogenesis—updated 2019. Cells, 8(11), 1419.
18) Zhao, X., Sun, D., Zhang, A., Huang, H., Li, Y., & Xu, D. (2023). Candida albicans-induced activation of the TGF-β/Smad pathway and upregulation of IL-6 may contribute to intrauterine adhesion. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 579.
19) Tian J, Al-Odaini AA, Wang Y, Korah J, Dai M, Xiao L, et al. KiSS1 gene as a novel mediator of TGFbeta-mediated cell invasion in triple negative breast cancer. Cell Signal. 2018;42:1–10.
20) Yaseen, O. Q.(2023). Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant and PolyPhen-2 Algorithms: A Variation in Exon 14 of ATP7B Gene among 4 West Iraqi Families with Wilson Disease. AL-ANBAR MEDICAL JOURNAL,.
21) Long, Y., Zeng, S., Gao, F., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., Zhou, C., … & Yang, H. (2023). SERPINA5 may promote the development of preeclampsia by disruption of the uPA/uPAR pathway. Translational Research, 251, 14-26.
22) Omar Qahtan yaseen,Asra’a Adnan Abdul-Jali.(2024).Predicting Functional Impacts of Amino Acid Substitutions in Exon 21 of the ATP7B Gene for Wilson Disease Diagnosis,8,3,1-6.
23) Yi, Y., Cheng, J. C., Klausen, C., & Leung, P. C. (2018). TGF-β1 inhibits human trophoblast cell invasion by upregulating cyclooxygenase-2. Placenta, 68, 44-51.
24) Vivekanandam, V., Ellmers, R., Jayaseelan, D., Houlden, H., Männikkö, R., & Hanna, M. G. (2022). In silico versus functional characterization of genetic variants: lessons from muscle channelopathies. Brain.
25) Guzzi, A. F., Oliveira, F. S. L., Amaro, M. M. S., Tavares-Filho, P. F., & Gabriel, J. E. (2019). In silico prediction of the functional and structural consequences of the non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism A122V in bovine CXC chemokine receptor type 1. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 80, 39-46.
26) Yaseen, O. Q., Al-Ani, M. Q., & Majeed, Y. H. (2020). In-Silico prediction of impact on protein function caused by non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism in human ATP7B gene associated with Wilson disease. Research Journal of Biotechnology Vol, 15, 3.
27) Livesey, B. J., & Marsh, J. A. (2022). Interpreting protein variant effects with computational predictors and deep mutational scanning. Disease Models & Mechanisms, 15(6), dmm049510.
28) Livesey, B. J., & Marsh, J. A. (2020). Using deep mutational scanning to benchmark variant effect predictors and identify disease mutations. Molecular systems biology, 16(7), e9380.
29) Quan, L., Wu, H., Lyu, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2019). DAMpred: Recognizing Disease-Associated nsSNPs through Bayes-Guided Neural-Network Model Built on Low-Resolution Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein–Protein Interactions. Journal of molecular biology, 431(13), 2449-2459.