The Treatment of Miller’s Class I Gingival Recession Implementing the Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique (MCAT) and Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM)

  • Home
  • The Treatment of Miller’s Class I Gingival Recession Implementing the Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique (MCAT) and Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM)

The Treatment of Miller’s Class I Gingival Recession Implementing the Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique (MCAT) and Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM)

1Michelle Suhartono, 2Chiquita Prahasanti, 3Novia Wiyono
1Student of Periodontology Residency Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
2Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
3Former Student of Periodontology Residency Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia


ABSTRACT: 

Background: Gingival  recession can lead to root hypersensitivity, root caries, and impaired aesthetic concerns. Modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique, which possesses various benefits that can be used to support the success in the treatment of gingival recession. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is used in the procedure, frequently documented indicating encouraging results in the treatment of gingival recession. The following case report is to indicate an evaluation on the treatment utilizing MCAT with ADM.
Case presentation: A male of 27 year-old arrived with main complaints of aesthetic concerns and dental hypersensitivity on the upper right teeth posterior caused by Miller’s class I gingival recession. The aforementioned technique is chosen in treatment considering the rate of success to treat the defects as the impact of gingival recession.
Case management: The MCAT with ADM commenced with the fabrication of composite stops at the contact points. Later local anaesthesia (lidocaine HCl 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000) was given. Intrasulcular incision was then made and the mucoperiosteal flap was raised with tunneling knives. The tunnel was then extended over the mucogingival junction. ADM was pulled into the tunnel by means of mattress sutures. Finally the tunnel was positioned coronally to the CEJ by means of suspended sutures placed around the contact points.
Conclusion: The use of MCAT technique with ADM (Mucoderm) is able to show satisfying outcome with the improvement of root coverage in the case of Miller’s class I gingival recession.

 

KEYWORDS:

Gingival recession, Miller, modified coronally advanced tunnel, acellular dermal matrix, root coverage

 

REFERENCES :

1) Lahham, C.; Ta’a, M. A. Clinical Comparison between Different Surgical Techniques Used to Manage Advanced Gingival Recession (Miller’s Class III & IV). Heliyon 2022, 8 (8), e10132.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10132.
2) Molnár, B.; Aroca, S.; Keglevich, T.; Gera, I.; Windisch, P.; Stavropoulos, A.; Sculean, A. Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Miller Class I and II Gingival Recessions with Collagen Matrix and the Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique. Quintessence Int 2013, 44 (1), 17–24.

https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a28739.
3) Pini-Prato, G. The Miller Classification of Gingival Recession: Limits and Drawbacks. J Clin Periodontol 2011, 38 (3), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01655.x.
4) Wijaksana, I. K. E.; Wiyono, N.; Ulfah, N.; Rubianto, M. The Management of Miller’s Class I Gingival Recession: Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) in Combination with Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Case Report. Journal of International Oral Health 2022, 14 (4), 427.

https://doi.org/10.4103/JIOH.JIOH_43_22.
5) Vincent-Bugnas, S.; Borie, G.; Charbit, Y. Treatment of Multiple Maxillary Adjacent Class I and II Gingival Recessions with Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel and a New Xenogeneic Acellular Dermal Matrix. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018, 30 (2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12337.
6) Yadav, V.; Kamra, P.; Deepti; Singh, N.; Bhatia, A.; Yadav, R. Treatment of Multiple Lingual Gingival Recession Defects in Mandibular Incisors with Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique and Connective Tissue Graft: A Case Series. Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology 2021, 23, 282–288.
7) Cosgarea, R.; Juncar, R.; Arweiler, N.; Lascu, L.; Sculean, A. Clinical Evaluation of a Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Class I, II, and III Gingival Recessions Using the Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique. Quintessence Int 2016, 47 (9), 739–747. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a36565.
8) Fahmy, R. A.; Taalab, M. R. Modified Tunnel Technique for Management of Gingival Recession in Esthetic Zone Using
Acellular Dermal Matrix versus Connective Tissue Graft. Future Dental Journal 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.12.001.
9) Aroca, S.; Molnár, B.; Windisch, P.; Gera, I.; Salvi, G. E.; Nikolidakis, D.; Sculean, A. Treatment of Multiple Adjacent
Miller Class I and II Gingival Recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) Technique and a Collagen Matrix or Palatal Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. J Clin Periodontol 2013, 40 (7), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12112.
10) Modaressi, M.; Wang, H.-L. Tunneling Procedure for Root Coverage Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Case Series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009, 29 (4), 395–403

  • Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *