ABSTRACT

Damage to the inferior alveolar nerve is a significant complication of mandibular surgery and particularly after surgery in the area of the mandibular canal. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence, risk factors, severity and recovery rate of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury after mandibular surgery. This was a retrospective observational study that included 60 patients who were admitted in a major teaching hospital in Baghdad, Iraq, from January to June 2025 and whose follow-up records were analyzed for a maximum of six months. All the clinical, radiographic, operative and postoperative neurosensory data were gathered from hospital records and statistically analyzed. 14 patients out of 60 had suffered an injury of the inferior alveolar nerve with an overall incidence of 23.3%. Close Canal proximity, Cortical Border interruption, Canal narrowing, High risk CBCT findings, Prolonged operative time, High surgical difficulty, Bone removal and Intra-operative canal exposure were significant factors associated with injury. The neurosensory disturbances in most cases gradually improved with 64.3% of the injured cases fully recovered at 6 months. The authors summarized that careful radiographic examination, surgical planning, and structured neurosensory evaluation postoperatively is crucial to minimize the risk of nerve injury and enhance outcomes.

kEYWORDS

Inferior alveolar nerve injury; Mandibular surgery; Neurosensory disturbance; Mandibular canal; CBCT; Risk factors; Oral and maxillofacial surgery.

REFERENCES

1) F. Kang, M. K. Sah, and G. Fei, “Determining the risk relationship associated with inferior alveolar nerve injury following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: A systematic review,” Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.06.010.
2) H. J. Kim, Y. J. Jo, J. S. Choi, H. J. Kim, J. Kim, and S. Y. Moon, “Anatomical risk factors of inferior alveolar nerve injury association with surgical extraction of mandibular third molar in Korean population,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 816, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11020816.
3) Y. Li, Z. Ling, H. Zhang, H. Xie, P. Zhang, H. Jiang, and Y. Fu, “Association of the inferior alveolar nerve position and nerve injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Healthcare, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 1782, 2022, doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091782.
4) Y. Chai, Y. Dong, Y. Lu, W. Wei, M. Chen, and C. Yang, “Risk factors associated with inferior alveolar nerve injury after extraction of impacted lower mandibular third molars: A prospective cohort study,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 1100–1108, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.05.003.
5) W. Z. Tay, A. Sklavos, M. Mian, S. Delpachitra, and A. Chandu, “Radiographic predictors of postoperative inferior alveolar nerve injury in mandibular third molar surgery,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.10.004.
6) J. F. Peña-Cardelles, J. Markovic, S. Akhondi, I. Pedrinaci, A. Lanis, and G. O. Gallucci, “Inferior alveolar nerve damage related to dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. e578–e589, 2025, doi: 10.4317/medoral.27125.
7) V. C. B. Reia, G. de Toledo Telles-Araujo, M. Peralta-Mamani, M. R. Biancardi, C. M. F. Rubira, and I. R. F. Rubira-Bullen, “Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to panoramic radiography in predicting IAN exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 4721–4733, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03942-4.
8) H. R. Zhao, N. Zhao, Y. X. Xu, F. C. Wang, and W. L. Xiao, “Evaluation, prevention, and treatment of inferior alveolar nerve injury in bilateral sagittal split mandibular osteotomy,” Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 47, article 31, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40902-025-00486-5.
9) H. He and N. Ruan, “Factors influencing inferior alveolar nerve injury after extraction of mandibular third molar,” Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. e613–e619, 2024, doi: 10.4317/medoral.26576.
10) A. Shokri, A. S. Farnia, A. Heidari, F. Abbasiyan, and B. Alafchi, “Radiographic relationship of third molars with the mandibular canal as a predictor of inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Imaging Science in Dentistry, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 114–125, 2025, doi: 10.5624/isd.20240243.
11) A. B. G. Tay and W. S. Go, “Inferior alveolar nerve injury in trauma-induced mandible fractures,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 1328–1340, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.003.
12) V. Kulkarni, N. K. Sahoo, I. D. Roy, and S. Ghosh, “Neurosensory evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve following mandibular fracture fixation using modified Zuniga and Essick’s protocol,” Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 4, 2021, article 100171, doi: 10.1016/j.adoms.2021.100171.
13) L. D. Sulistyani, V. Julia, D. Noviantika, I. Irfan, M. Muskab, and P. G. P. D. Kawisana, “Evaluation of neuro-sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve after ORIF procedure in mandibular fracture: A systematic review,” Journal of Stomatology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 130–137, 2022, doi: 10.5114/jos.2022.117413.
14) J. Han and J. J. Han, “Risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury associated with implant surgery: An observational study,” Journal of Dental Sciences, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 270–277, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.07.025.
15) N. C. Del Lhano, R. A. Ribeiro, C. C. Martins, N. M. S. P. Assis, and K. L. Devito, “Panoramic versus CBCT used to reduce inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after third molar extractions: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 49, no. 4, article 20190265, 2020, doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190265.
16) G. de Toledo Telles-Araújo, M. Peralta-Mamani, R. D. G. Caminha, A. F. Moraes-da-Silva, C. M. F. Rubira, H. M. Honório, and I. R. F. Rubira-Bullen, “CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 24, pp. 1137–1149, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03231-6.
17) A. Putrino et al., “Inferior alveolar nerve impairment following third-molar extraction: Management of complications and medicolegal considerations,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 14, no. 7, article 2349, 2025, doi: 10.3390/jcm14072349.
18) J. M. de Abreu et al., “Health-related quality of life with iatrogenic inferior alveolar nerve injuries treated with photobiomodulation: A comparative study,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 13, no. 23, article 7237, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jcm13237237.
19) S. Kubota, T. Imai, A. Nishimoto, S. Amekawa, and N. Uzawa, “External validation of cone-beam computed tomography- and panoramic radiography-featured prediction models for inferior alveolar nerve injury after lower third molar removal: Proposal of a risk calculator,” Odontology, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 178–191, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10266-022-00716-6.
20) Q. R. Jin and Z. J. Xie, “Evaluating the risk factors of inferior alveolar nerve injury following removal of the mandibular third molars,” Chinese Journal of Stomatology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 258–265, 2022.

Cite this article

Shihab, D. S. M. (2026). Evaluation of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury Following Mandibular Surgery. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH, 5(5), 467-479. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijhmr.2026.v5i5n19