ABSTRACT

Mandibular canal variations are anatomical structures that occur as a result of errors in the fusion of primitive canals during the embryological process and are of clinical importance in oral surgery, implantology, and local anesthesia. The aim of the present study was to examine the scientific production, conceptual structure, research trends, and thematic development of the literature related to these variations using bibliometric analysis. The data were obtained by screening articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection database between 1995 and 2025. For the bibliometric analysis, the bibliometrix package was used through R, RStudio, and Biblioshiny. Annual Scientific Production, Keyword Co-occurrence Analysis, Trend Topics Analysis, Thematic Map Analysis, and Thematic Evolution Analysis related to the topic were examined. Scientific production in the related field showed an increasing trend over the years. Keyword network analysis demonstrated that the terms “mandibular canal,” “inferior alveolar nerve,” “cone-beam computed tomography,” and “bifid mandibular canal” were prominent. Trend and thematic analyses showed that research trends shifted over time from implant surgery and basic anatomical variations toward CBCT-based imaging, surgical planning, and the prevention of complications. The results of this study demonstrated that scientific production related to mandibular canal variations has increased over the years and that research trends in the field have changed with the widespread use of three-dimensional imaging modalities, particularly cone-beam computed tomography.

KEYWORDS

Anatomical Variation, Bibliometric Analysis, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Dental Implants, Mandibular Canal

REFERENCES

1) Castro MAA, Lagravere-Vich MO, Amaral TMP, Abreu MHG, Mesquita RA. Classifications of mandibular canal branching: A review of literature. World journal of radiology. 2015;7(12):531.
2) Chávez-Lomeli M, Mansilla Lory J, Pompa J, Kjaer I. The human mandibular canal arises from three separate canals innervating different tooth groups. Journal of Dental Research. 1996;75(8):1540-4.
3) Asghar A, Priya A, Ravi KS, Iwanaga J, Tubbs RS, Naaz S, et al. An evaluation of mandibular canal variations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anatomical Science International. 2023;98(2):176-84.
4) Valenzuela-Fuenzalida J, Cariseo C, Gold M, Díaz D, Orellana M, Iwanaga J. Anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and their clinical implications in dental practice: a literature review. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2021;43:1259-72.
5) Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2009;24(1).
6) D’Agostino S, Valentini G, Baldini A, Ferrara E, Dolci M. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Bifid and Trifid Mandibular Canals: A Cross-Sectional Study. Oral. 2023;3(2):266-75.
7) Mizbah K, Gerlach N, Maal T, Bergé S, Meijer GJ. The clinical relevance of bifid and trifid mandibular canals. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2012;16:147-51.
8) Iwanaga J, Takeshita Y, Matsushita Y, Hur M-S, Ibaragi S, Tubbs RS. What are the retromolar and bifid/trifid mandibular canals as seen on cone-beam computed tomography? Revisiting classic gross anatomy of the inferior alveolar nerve and correcting terminology. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2022:1-10.
9) Ngeow WC, Chai WL. The clinical anatomy of accessory mandibular canal in dentistry. Clinical Anatomy. 2020;33(8):1214-27.
10) Wyatt WM. Accessory mandibular canal: literature review and presentation of an additional variant. Quintessence international. 1996;27(2).
11) Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ. Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 1985;110(6):923-6.
12) Shan S, Zhong S, Li J, Wang T. Systematic review and meta-analysis of mandibular canal variations on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiology. 2022;38(4):445-51.
13) Landfald IC, Łapot M, Olewnik Ł. Imaging-Based Clinical Management of Mandibular Canal Variants: PR–CBCT–Selective MRI. Biomedicines. 2025;13(11):2760.
14) Türker N, Kucuk Kurtgoz M, Cecen Erol E, Aktuna Belgin C. Bifid mandibular canals: anatomical variations and morphometric analysis based on a modified CBCT classification. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2026;48(1):117.
15) Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh M, Ariji Y, Izumi M, et al. Bifid mandibular canal in Japanese. Implant dentistry. 2007;16(1):24-32.
16) Yeung AWK. The usage of the terms mandibular canal, inferior alveolar canal, and inferior dental canal in the academia: a bibliometric analysis. Int j morphol. 2021;39(4):1058-62.
17) Ellegaard O. The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics. 2018;116(1):181-202.
18) Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research. 2021;133:285-96.
19) Passas I. Bibliometric analysis: the main steps. Encyclopedia. 2024;4(2).
20) Cuozzo A, Vincenzo I-S, Boariu M, Rusu D, Stratul S-I, Galasso L, et al. Prevalence and anatomical characteristics of bifid and trifid mandibular canals: a computer tomography analysis. Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry. 2024;22:b5573959.
21) Claeys V, Wackens G. Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2005;34(1):55-8.
22) Behfarnia P, Meshkinnejad R, Ahmadishadmehri M, Afshari Z. Anatomic considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular posterior region–A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1924.
23) Peker I, Alkurt MT, Mihcioglu T. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2008;23(3).
24) Sekerci AE, Sahman H. Cone beam computed tomographic analyses of the position and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014(1):945671.
25) Mallya S, Lam E. White and Pharoah’s Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation: Mosby; 2018.
26) Weiss R, Read-Fuller A. Cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: an evidence-based review. Dentistry journal. 2019;7(2):52.
27) Sarikov R, Juodzbalys G. Inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar extraction: a literature review. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. 2014;5(4):e1.
28) -Mejía J, Ruge-Jiménez O, Aguilar-Méndez G, Ñáñez-López Ó, Oliveros-Torres G. Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the position and course of the mandibular canal. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia. 2010;22(1):12-22.

Cite this article

KAYA, M. S. (2026). Bibliometric Analysis of Anatomical Variations of The Mandibular Canal in Dentistry. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH, 5(5), 501-506. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijhmr.2026.v5i5n23