ABSTRACT 

Background. Acute subdural haematoma (ASDH) is one of the deadliest focal lesions after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Where CT, intracranial-pressure monitoring and operating theatres are hard to access, little is known about its prognosis.
Objective. To describe the presentation and management of ASDH as the principal lesion and to look for factors associated with unfavourable outcome.
Methods. Retrospective single-centre study using the TBI database of Bouaké University Hospital (Côte d’Ivoire), historical (2016–2021) and recent (2025–2026) series. We included patients whose principal lesion was ASDH (n = 149). Outcome was unfavourable when the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was ≤ 3 at last documented contact, deaths included. After univariable comparisons (Mann–Whitney, Fisher’s exact test), we fitted Firth penalised logistic regression restricted to two variables, because events were few.
Results. Median age was 35 years, 85.9% of patients were male and median admission GCS was 13. A procedure was entered in the operating register for 66.4%; in-hospital mortality was 6.7%. Of 138 patients with evaluable outcome, 12 (8.7%) had an unfavourable outcome. Low GCS, anisocoria, intubation and severe TBI were associated with it (all p ≤ 0.003); age and time to admission were not. GCS remained strongly associated with unfavourable outcome after adjustment for age (OR 0.58 per point; 95% CI 0.42–0.74).
Conclusion. On admission, GCS was strongly associated with unfavourable outcome, independently of age. With 12 events the analysis is exploratory: it could not adjust for anisocoria or for surgery.

KEYWORDS

acute subdural haematoma; traumatic brain injury; Glasgow Coma Scale; prognosis; Firth regression; low- and middle-income countries; sub-Saharan Africa.

REFERENCES

1) Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):987–1048.
2) Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, et al. Surgical management of acute subdural hematomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(3 Suppl):S16–S24.
3) Leitgeb J, Mauritz W, Brazinova A, et al. Outcome after severe brain trauma due to acute subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(2):324–333.
4) Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics (IMPACT). PLoS Med. 2008;5(8):e165.
5) MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators, Perel P, Arango M, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ. 2008;336(7641):425–429.
6) Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(1):6–15.
7) von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457.
8) Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet. 1975;1(7905):480–484.
9) Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80(1):27–38.
10) Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2409–2419.
11) Puhr R, Heinze G, Nold M, Lusa L, Geroldinger A. Firth’s logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions? Stat Med. 2017;36(14):2302–2317.
12) Servadei F. Prognostic factors in severely head injured adult patients with acute subdural haematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139(4):279–285.
13) Wilberger JE Jr, Harris M, Diamond DL. Acute subdural hematoma: morbidity, mortality, and operative timing. J Neurosurg. 1991;74(2):212–218.
14) Kotwica Z, Brzeziński J. Acute subdural haematoma in adults: an analysis of outcome in comatose patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;121(3–4):95–99.
15) Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(26):2471–2481.
16) Stocchetti N, Maas AIR. Traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(22):2121–2130.
17) Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(12):1119–1130.
18) Hawryluk GWJ, Rubiano AM, Totten AM, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: 2020 update of the decompressive craniectomy recommendations. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(3):427–434.
19) Hutchinson PJ, Adams H, Mohan M, et al. Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(24):2219–2229.
20) Honeybul S, Ho KM. Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: the relationship between surgical complications and the prediction of an unfavourable outcome. Injury. 2014;45(9):1332–1339.

Cite this article

Fionko, Y. B., Teti, L. S. F., Diaby, R., Kouassi, K. J. J., Kouadio, A., & Haidara, A. (2026). Acute Post-Traumatic Subdural Haematoma in a Resource-Limited Setting: Presentation, Management and Prognostic Factors for Unfavourable Outcome. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH, 5(10), 982-988. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijhmr.2026.v5i10n03