ABSTRACT 

Background: Caesarean section (CS) is an essential intervention that reduces maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality when medically indicated. However, perceptions of caesarean delivery among women, families, communities, and healthcare providers in lower middle-income countries (LMICs) are shaped by cultural beliefs, socioeconomic conditions, healthcare experiences, and availability of resources. These perceptions influence acceptance, utilization, and decision-making regarding mode of delivery.
Aim: This narrative review examines perceptions of caesarean delivery in LMICs, exploring factors influencing acceptance or refusal, sociocultural beliefs, experiences of women, healthcare provider perspectives, and implications for maternal health services.
Method: A narrative review of published literature was conducted using electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Relevant studies addressing perceptions, attitudes, beliefs, experiences, and decision-making regarding caesarean delivery in LMICs were reviewed. Studies involving pregnant and postpartum women with their significant others, families, communities, and healthcare providers were included.
Results: Perceptions of caesarean delivery in LMICs are complex and vary between settings. While many women recognize CS as a life-saving procedure, others perceive it as unnatural, dangerous, expensive, or associated with social stigma. Fear of pain, death, infertility, poor recovery, and inability to perform domestic roles contributes to negative attitudes. Conversely, previous positive experiences, improved education, counselling, and respectful maternity care increase acceptance. Healthcare system factors, including provider communication, cost, and access to emergency services, strongly influence perceptions.
Conclusion: Improving perceptions of caesarean delivery in LMICs requires culturally sensitive education, respectful maternity care, improved communication, and equitable access to safe surgical services. Addressing misconceptions while respecting women’s preferences is essential for reducing preventable maternal and neonatal complications.

KEYWORDS

Caesarean section; perception; maternal health; lower middle-income countries; cultural beliefs; childbirth; respectful maternity care.

REFERENCES

1) Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667-670.
2) Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-1348.
3) Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
4) Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on maternal and offspring health. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349-1357.
5) Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349-1357.
6) World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
7) World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on maternal and newborn care for a positive postnatal experience. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
8) Montagu D, Sudhinaraset M, Diamond-Smith N, et al. Where women give birth: facility-based delivery in LMICs. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:116.
9) Nigeria Health Watch. Caesarean Sections in Nigeria – Thoughts, Belief Systems and Perceptions.articles.nigeriahealthwatch.com 2020.
10) Ogechi Abazie, Aishat Yetunde Abdul-Kareem. Pregnant Women’s Knowledge and Perceptions of Caesarean section in Lagos State, Nigeria. July 2019. African Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health 13(3):1-11. Doi:10.12968/ajmw.2018.0012.
11) Elom NA, Nwimo IO, Ilo CI, et al. Belief towards Caesarean Section: A community-based study of male partners in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. SAGE Open Medicare 2023;11. doi:10.1177/20503121221147810
12) Oyeyemi N, Onwudiegwu U, Pughikumo D, Oyeyemi AS. Perception of caesarean delivery by patients and their care-givers in the ultra-short stay versus the traditional post-operative management protocol following uncomplicated Caesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Niger Delta J Med Med Res. 2025;4(2):70-78.
13) Oyeyemi N, Afolabi BB, Oyeneyin OL, Oyeyemi AS. Are patients more satisfied with the short-stay than the traditional protocol following uncomplicated caesarean delivery? A clinical trial in the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Nigeria. Niger Delta J Med Med Res. 2025;4(1):42–51.
14) Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847.
15) Afulani PA, Diamond-Smith N, Phillips B, Singhal S. Validation of a tool to measure respectful maternity care. Reprod Health. 2017;14:8.
16) Sando D, Ratcliffe H, McDonald K, et al. The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Reprod Health. 2016;13:98.
17) Okeke SR, Chukwuma A, et al. Women’s experiences and perceptions of caesarean delivery in low-resource settings. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:718.
18) McCourt C, Rayment J, Rance S, Sandall J. An ethnographic study of the influence of birth culture on maternity care. Midwifery. 2016;43:1-9.
19) Ajepe AA, Bello FA, Adewole IF. Caesarean section and maternal perceptions in Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2019;23(3):74-82.
20) Kassa ZY, Gebremedhin M, et al. Women’s perceptions and acceptance of caesarean section in developing countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:690.
21) Long Q, Kingdon C, Yang F, et al. Prevalence of and reasons for caesarean section in China and LMIC contexts. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1116-e1125.
22) Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Caesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016;2:13.
23) Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. WHO recommendations on non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96:165-173.
24) Gibbons L, et al. Global disparities in caesarean section rates. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-1348.

Cite this article

Oyeyemi, N. (2026). Perception of Caesarean Section in Lower Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH, 5(9), 919-922. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijhmr.2026.v5i9n09